Title: Russian Billionaire Accuses Sotheby’s of Collusion in High-Stakes Art Trial
Subtitle: Dmitry Rybolovlev speaks out on the need for transparency in the art market
In a stunning art trial unfolding at a Swiss court, Russian billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev has testified against renowned auction house Sotheby’s, alleging collusion with a Swiss art dealer to defraud him of tens of millions of dollars. The emotional testimony revealed Rybolovlev’s deep trust in the dealer, whom he considered a member of his own family.
Rybolovlev’s legal team contends that the art dealer profited by purchasing artworks from Sotheby’s and then reselling them to Rybolovlev at inflated prices. Over a span of twelve years, from 2002 to 2014, the billionaire invested an astonishing $2 billion to assemble an art collection of global renown.
During cross-examination, Sotheby’s attorney questioned Rybolovlev’s reliance on his advisers and criticized his failure to request supporting documents verifying the destination of his considerable funds. Nevertheless, Rybolovlev blamed the art industry’s opaque practices for his financial losses, stating that Sotheby’s should have recognized the alleged deception he was subjected to.
Importantly, Rybolovlev highlighted that his pursuit of justice against Sotheby’s extends beyond monetary compensation. He argues for more transparency within the art market, highlighting the need for accountability and fair dealings.
In response, Sotheby’s lawyer argued that Rybolovlev aims to hold an innocent party responsible for the actions of others. Nevertheless, the Russian tycoon maintains that he was deceived by both the art dealer and a London-based executive at Sotheby’s during the acquisition of 38 art pieces.
Among the disputed artworks, Leonardo da Vinci’s masterpiece, “Salvator Mundi,” is the pinnacle of attention. Nonetheless, it is essential to note that only four pieces are under scrutiny during this trial.
Notably, the art dealer, Yves Bouvier, reached a settlement with Rybolovlev under undisclosed conditions, with his legal team firmly denying any allegations of fraud.
Beyond the courtroom, Rybolovlev’s inclusion on a list of individuals linked to Russian President Vladimir Putin by the Trump administration adds a layer of political intrigue to the case. However, the billionaire has not resided in Russia for the past three decades, with his lawyers emphasizing that he is not subject to the sanctions imposed after Russia’s actions in Ukraine.
As this high-stakes art trial continues, the outcome could have far-reaching implications for the art industry, signaling a demand for greater transparency and ethical practices. For Dmitry Rybolovlev, it is not just about pursuing justice but also about provoking a transformative shift within the art market.
“Infuriatingly humble tv expert. Friendly student. Travel fanatic. Bacon fan. Unable to type with boxing gloves on.”